Filed under: Industry Standards, News, Stroke Prevention & Care, Telemedicine | Tags: acute stroke care, AcuteCare Telemedicine, AMA, american telemedicine association, atlanta healthcare, healthcare industry, healthcare news, James Kiely, legislation, medicare, medicare reimbursement, mhealth, stroke care, Technology, telehealth, telemedicine, teleneurology, telestroke
Senator Roger Wicker, R-Mississippi has introduced legislation that seeks to remove barriers to telehealth services in Medicare. Medicare fee for service (FFS) does currently provide reimbursement for telehealth services to patients at rural area health clinics, however, current law limits telehealth reimbursement to rural areas, disallows the storage of information to physicians via electronic medical records, email and other communications technology and doesn’t reimburse telehealth services provided by physical or occupational therapists or for physicians who treat patients within their own home.
The bill, Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act, attempts to broaden telehealth services across the country and offer an added opportunity to serve the needs of the elderly. The bill, which has broad bipartisan congressional support, would allow Medicare patients to use video conferencing, remote patient monitoring and technology to transfer patient data and will expand Medicare reimbursement of telehealth consultations and remote patient monitoring with fewer restrictions.
“This legislation has the potential to remove barriers to new healthcare delivery models that promote coordinated and patient-centered care. Importantly, the bill aims to maintain high standards whether a patient is seeing a physician in an office or via telemedicine,” said American Medical Association (AMA) President Steven Stack. “Telemedicine can strengthen the patient-physician relationship and improve access for patients with chronic conditions and limited access to quality care. The AMA’s guiding principles on telemedicine seek to foster innovation while promoting quality care.”
According to an analysis by the health-care consulting firm Avalere, expanded Telehealth services could save $1.8 billion dollars in medical cost over the next ten years by removing the current restrictions, and would make healthcare more available for patients who often struggle with access to the latest high quality care.
“We strongly believe in the importance of implementing processes and procedures for telemedicine. Our experience working with regional hospitals as well as enterprise level healthcare systems, has demonstrated that effectively executed telemedicine programs can drive significant value,” comments Dr. James Kiely, Partner, ACT. “In our most recent peer-reviewed article, we’ve proven that a telemedicine system can produce meaningful improvement in markers of telestroke efficiency in the face of rapid growth of a telestroke network.”
With a vastly aging population, Federal and State legislators must continue to make improvements in access to quality healthcare for Medicare patients even if it means establishing new legislation designed to govern telemedicine responsibly.
Filed under: Telemedicine | Tags: ACT, acute care, AcuteCare Telemedicine, AMA, american telemedicine association, business, doctors, Federation of State Medical Boards, FSMB, health, health care, healthcare, Human Services, institutions, medical, medical industry, medicine, modern medicine, patients, practitioners, protections, states, Technology, telecommunications, telehealth, telemedicine, U.S. Department of Health
The number of patients served by telemedicine has grown from a few thousand in the mid-1980s to an estimated 10 million people today. The majority of the growth occurred in the last decade, according to the American Telemedicine Association. Despite the rapid adoption of telemedicine practices by healthcare institutions, practitioners must meet individual state medical licensing requirements.
Some states argue that easing licensing requirements could jeopardize patient safety. If doctors practice without obtaining a license in that state, regulators maintain that they have no power to conduct an investigation or explore a consumer complaint. In addition, doctors would not benefit from any legal protections the state may have against malpractice lawsuits. Advocates of telemedicine argue that because doctors take standardized national exams, with many requirements set by federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, states should recognize other state licenses. The debate is not without merit, on either side of the issue.
In a time past, interstate commerce experienced similar obstructions to improving the nationwide consumer product and service delivery model. Implemented in an era before advanced transportation technology and the interstate highway system carriers of goods and services across state lines were required to have individual state licenses, adhere to 50 different sets of roadway regulations and pay transportation taxes and fees in every state where transportation service was provided. The very formidable barriers to streamlining interstate commerce were successfully circumvented by a new national regulatory and licensing system. The move successfully addressed the individual state concerns and resulted in massive improvements to the nationwide delivery of good and services to all consumers, no matter where they resided.
Today, as major telecommunications and health care firms look to create nationwide telemedicine businesses, state medical licensing boards are set to consider an “interstate medical licensure compact” that would give doctors and patients legal protections in any state that signs on. The proposal, to be considered at the annual meeting of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) this month, would expedite the licensing process for doctors who want to practice across state borders. The compact, which was developed by a task force of 22 state medical boards, may represent the first step in resolving the issue. Lisa Robin, chief advocacy officer for the federation, expects there will be some early adopters. “I believe there will be some proliferation.”
The medical industry is facing significant challenges in the coming decades, such as physician shortages, spiraling costs of care, specialist accessibility and the entry of millions of new patients to the market as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is fully implemented. In order to implement a long-term solution, technology standards and medical licensing requirements share equal importance in the debate.